Skip to main content

#Trump and #Xi make positive start on new relationship.

The world's "most important bilateral relationship" made a positive new beginning with President Trump's state visit to China. The bonhomie produced bodes well for the world as they oversee one-third of the world’s economy, a quarter of its trade and command its two most powerful armies. Having achieved a landmark consensus on China-U.S. relations, President Xi Jinping announced: "The meeting between myself and President Trump sets the tone and lays a solid foundation for the solid development of the China-U.S. relationship. It will achieve more results and more benefits for people around the world." Amid the good vibes, President Trump was optimistic that the two countries could effectively resolve problems in the world together, and looked forward "to building an even stronger relationship." Regarding the trade imbalance, he surprised some by saying: "The U.S. really has to change its policies because they’ve gotten so far behind on trade with China, and frankly with many other countries.” He affirmed to President Xi that, "It's too bad past administrations allowed it to get so far out of kilter. We'll make it fair and it'll be tremendous for both of us." And tremendous it has already been, with 37 major China-U.S. deals worth US$253.5 billion signed in fields as diverse as LNG supply, banking and aviation; one gas deal alone is worth a massive $43 billion. The names of the companies involved – such as Caterpillar, Boeing and Goldman Sachs – are stellar performers on the world stage. Thus, Trump was able to prove himself as someone who had achieved more than any other America leader visiting China. Notably, the joint fund deal between the China Silk Road Fund and Goldman Sachs could bring U.S. businesses into the Belt and Road Initiative, especially as this powerful American bank has considerable clout in American politics. Moreover, the $43 billion investment by Petrochem China in joint gas exploration projects in Alaska, is one that should help reduce the huge trade deficit with the U.S. and thus meet Trump's goals set out from day one of his administration. Opening up financial institutions to 51 percent ownership by foreign entities, China will provide established foreign banks the opportunity to enter its domestic market in a significant way. And, due to mutual efforts and four-level dialogue, China and the U.S. will be increasingly inter-connected in the coming days. Being a businessman, Trump has long wanted to benefit from U.S.-China economic ties in a way that major challenges such as the massive $350 billion bilateral trade deficit can be addressed. Having set a 3 percent growth target to rebuild America's collapsing infrastructure, restore manufacturing sectors and reduce unemployment, these trade deals should help to improve his political standing at home. As it is, Chinese companies have invested $20 billion in nine American states, creating 45,000 jobs and the leading recipient of Chinese investment abroad is undoubtedly the U.S., which "received over $160 billion between January 2005 and June 2017." Being intertwined to a great degree, both economies need stability at the national and international level for continuous economic growth. Enhancing co-operation on bilateral issues is beneficial for these top trade partners which already have annual two-way goods trade worth $578.6 billion and at least $60 billion of mutual foreign direct investment. Symbolizing the inseparable nature of their ties, both countries were dubbed "Chimerica" by the historian Niall Ferguson and economist Moritz Schularick. Having created history, it is important that the positive impact from these deals is retained and made sustainable; mutually-acceptable solutions must be found and a workable trust level must be promoted. Even where foreign policy is concerned, the two nations are finding some common ground. There was a Trump-Xi agreement over nuclear non-proliferation and de-nuclearization of North Korea, assistance to Iraq and standing by the "Afghan-owned and Afghan-led" way to realize that country’s peaceful reconstruction. This is a promising omen for the world, as a good understanding between the U.S. and China remains the prerequisite for world peace and security. In a chain reaction, any friction between the two trickles down to many other countries. Even as critics recognize U.S.-China ties as the most important relationship of the century, some identify grey areas. As Professor B.R. Deepak from the J N University in Delhi has said: "Both sides are likely to engage in pragmatic cooperation beneficial to them, for the relationship has to be that of mutual benefit as the stakes are too high on both sides.” Even as goodwill prevails, compatibility has to be achieved between the economic and geopolitical interests for lasting peace. At the end of the day this "most important bilateral relationship" has the potential to change the world and remaining realistic and constant is the key. Sabena Siddiqui (Twitter: @sabena_siddiqi) is a foreign affairs journalist and lawyer based in Pakistan. Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn. Follow China.org.cn on Twitter an

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Incursions on the China-India border

An unsettled atmosphere prevails on the China-India border following accusations of trespass by Indian border guards in the Sikkim section, followed by an Indian attempt to obstruct ongoing construction activities by the Chinese frontier forces in the Donglang region. Demanding an Indian troop withdrawal as a precondition to any further meaningful dialogue, the Chinese Foreign Ministry urged India to carry out a thorough investigation into the matter. Reaffirming that the Sikkim section of the China-India border is well-defined by treaties, the ministry’s spokesperson, Geng Shuang, pointed out that the Indian government has repeatedly confirmed these settlements in writing and has expressed no objections to them previously. Urging India to respect boundary treaties and China’s territorial sovereignty to maintain peace and stability, the foreign ministry also informed India through diplomatic channels that the entry of official Indian pilgrims at the Nathu La Pass, linking Sikki...

Bollywood movie #Padmavati causes culture war

Usually, movies are for entertainment, providing escape from a monotonous routine, and causing a clash of cultures is rare. Yet in India today, the Bollywood movie Padmavati has created a rift and split the masses into two camps. Amid unprecedented debate and extreme threats, India has seen real-time rioting for most of this year. Named after a mythical Rajput queen whose existence cannot be proven historically, references only being found in poetry around the year 1540, the controversy has served to expose the vulnerability of society to movies and the poignant effect they have on the masses. At times such as these, movies can become larger than life and create new imaginary battlegrounds. It all began when the hard-line faction, Rajput Karni Sena, accused famous movie maker Sanjay Leela Bhansali of having insulted the legendary Hindu Rajput queen's memory by depicting her as a heroine with an historic Muslim king. Soon, its members were vandalizing cinemas and at...

Preparing for the next SAARC Summit

Preparing for the next SAARC Summit By Sabena Siddiqui 0   Comment(s) Print   E-mail China.org.cn, March 23, 2018 Adjust font size:  After a two-year interval, it is now vital that the revival and re-grouping of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) happens as soon as possible for regional re-integration.  Having been relegated to the backseat since India's refusal to participate in the SAARC Summit in 2016 which was to be held in Islamabad, Pakistan, it has been given much less attention than it deserves. Now it is the right time to re-assess the options for SAARC and expedite the pending process. Pakistan still has to host the next summit and to announce a new date for later this year. Formed in 1985, the SAARC Charter requires the respective heads of state or government of all the member countries to meet once a year. This usually transpires every 18 months unless one of the eight members refuses to attend the meet.  In ...