Skip to main content

Casting off a symbol of political submission #Hijab #Iran

Ironically, the hijab was once a symbol of defiance that helped unite people from all strata of society against the liberal and Westernized monarchy in Iran. Sadly, what began as a political statement signifying a rejection of the “un-Islamic” nature of society at the time became the primary tool for imposing a stricter interpretation of Islam. When they adopted the hijab by choice, most Iranian women did not realize where it would lead. Moreover, during the revolution, it was never declared a compulsory prerequisite for participation, nor was the imposition of a dress code publicized as a demand. Bringing down the Pahlavi regime of the Shah of Iran was the single goal of the movement, but once it was achieved, the hijab was, in March 1979, declared mandatory. Shocked by this attack on their personal freedom, women took to the streets again, this time to protest against the rigid laws. ting off a symbol of political submission Sabena SiddiquiBy SABENA SIDDIQUI FEBRUARY 21, 2018 5:51 AM (UTC+8) 74 2 Ironically, the hijab was once a symbol of defiance that helped unite people from all strata of society against the liberal and Westernized monarchy in Iran. Sadly, what began as a political statement signifying a rejection of the “un-Islamic” nature of society at the time became the primary tool for imposing a stricter interpretation of Islam. When they adopted the hijab by choice, most Iranian women did not realize where it would lead. Moreover, during the revolution, it was never declared a compulsory prerequisite for participation, nor was the imposition of a dress code publicized as a demand. Bringing down the Pahlavi regime of the Shah of Iran was the single goal of the movement, but once it was achieved, the hijab was, in March 1979, declared mandatory. Shocked by this attack on their personal freedom, women took to the streets again, this time to protest against the rigid laws. The daily Report Must-reads from across Asia - directly to your inbox Your Email here Unsuccessful in resisting the new conservative system, Iranian women became victims of their own political action. Lacking support from men, who were intent giving the new hardline system a chance, Iranian women were left with no option but to adopt the stark black robe and veil, and endure a life devoid of glamor and fashion. Over the decades, the hijab became the strongest visual symbol of Iran’s conservative Islamic regime. Contravening the law was a punishable offense, and a “morality police” force was formed to make sure everybody complied. By excluding women from public places like sports stadiums, imposing strict etiquette rules and enforcing the hijab code, the state greatly increased its control over the private lives of its citizens. The hijab in Iran has never been about religion but politics and power; it represents state control over the people The strict dress code imposed by the government lacked the powerful religious symbolism it could have had if dressing that way had been left to individual choice. Considering this aspect, the hijab in Iran has never been about religion but politics and power; it represents state control over the people. Over the years, there have been instances of women rebelling against the “system.” Removing the hijab is seen as a rejection of the government, more treasonous in essence than heretical. Living in Iran is harder for women than it is in most Muslim countries, including neighboring Turkey and Pakistan, where personal attire is a matter of individual choice. In December 2017, the focus of protests over the rising prices of food essentials soon turned to the veil issue and women began removing it from Tehran to Mashhad, making it clear that many Iranian women want a more moderate way of life. There is now more widespread support from men, many of whom have been inspired by the courage of women risking arrest over their opposition to the mandatory hijab. Men have also spent 40 years enduring a dress code that prohibits casual clothing. Crossing personal boundaries is bound to produce discontent, as female parliamentarian Soheila Jaloodarzadeh observed: “When we restrict women and put them under unnecessary pressure, exactly this is the reason for rebellions, this is the reason the daughters of Revolution Street are putting their headscarves on a stick.” Alarmed by the growing protests, President Hassan Rouhani tried to address the issue, saying, “We cannot pick a lifestyle and tell two generations after us to live like that, it is impossible… the views of the young generation about life and the world is different than ours.” Soon after, Tehran police adopted a softer approach, letting women commit the offense several times without being arrested, and forcing them to attend “morality classes” to help them mend their ways. Signifying the split in Iranian society today, female disobedience campaigns have the potential to steal the limelight from other issues such as unemployment, inflation and corruption. This issue is the real ideological and existential challenge facing the regime in Iran. The hijab issue occupies center stage in the power dynamics between Iranian society and the regime. Monitoring the level to which the hijab rule is relaxed or enforced indicates the space and freedom given by the government to its citizens as a whole. Non-adherence to the hijab rule expresses an absolute rejection of the current government’s right-wing ideology. Acknowledging the unpopularity of the veil, Rouhani released a report that assesses the opposition to the hijab laws by at least 49% of the population. The three-year-old report was only made public in the aftermath of the December protests. Widely seen as an attempt to placate the masses, his efforts could even land him in the bad books of the orthodox government and religious leaders. Having said that, it is unlikely that this would result in reforms or a new policy; instead, it would generate a debate without any solution on the horizon. Asia Times is not responsible for the opinions, facts or any media content presented by contributors. In case of abuse, click here to report. IRAN SOCIETY POLITICS ROUHANI PAHLAVI ISLAMIC REVOLUTION TEHRAN ISLAM MUSLIM DRESS CODE MORALITY HIJAB SOHEILA JALOODARZADEH SHAH Sabena Siddiqui Sabena Siddiqui Foreign Affairs Journalist and geopolitical analyst with special focus on the Belt and Road Initiative, CPEC and South Asia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#BeltandRoadForum : a new way forward

The Belt and Road Forum: a new way forward By Sabena Siddiqui 0   Comment(s) Print   E-mail China.org.cn, May 10, 2017 Adjust font size:     The upcoming Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation will serve as a powerful reminder of the Belt and Road project’s dedication to win-win international development. [Zhang Xueshi/China.org.cn]  The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation will be held in Beijing on May 14 and 15; it will be hosted by President Xi himself, who will address an opening ceremony attended by at least 28 heads of state and more than 60 global organizations. Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif will lead a Pakistani delegation to the forum, and later he will have a meeting with President Xi and attend the round-table summit for leaders. The forum promises to be the biggest diplomatic event of the year, with greater attendance than both the NATO and the upcoming EUCO summits. The audience of 1,200 people includes UN ...

Is China opening up to the world via Belt Road Initiative?

Rebranding modern China today, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a focal part of Chinese foreign policy as well as the basis of its domestic economic strategy. Titled “Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road”, the official document signifies the “opening up” of China to the world. China has not looked back since the successful implementation of Deng Xiaopeng’s reforms in 1978 and it wants to share its expertise and experience with the world by executing an open economic venture for all. Unfortunately, the Belt and Road Initiative has been received with suspicion on the whole by the Western bloc and its allies. In the beginning, it was considered an alternative to the ASEAN grouping in the region but as time passed it became more large-scale and experts started linking up BRI with the “String of Pearls” theory. Coined by defense contractor  Booz Allen Hamilton  in his research study in 2005, this term descri...

Hopes high for the Saudi Vision 2030

In the aftermath of Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman’s unveiling of the unprecedented Vision 2030 reforms, a sense of renaissance seems to exist in Saudi Arabia. Diversifying the oil economy along new routes for rapid progress, it is definitely the brainchild of the young Prince; however, he modestly insists he is only "one of 20 million people. I am nothing without them." Nevertheless, such a holistic package for economic, cultural and societal reform has not been seen before in recent Saudi history. Opening up Saudi Arabia to the world, the Prince announced his country would become "moderate" and "open" and that he would "eradicate" radical Islamist ideology. "We are returning to what we were before -- a country of moderate Islam open to all religions and to the world," he told an audience of world luminaries attending a major investment conference in the country. Announcing a futuristic new city named "NEOM," 33...