Skip to main content

#Corbyn delivers damaging left hook to May

Recent terror attacks in Britain appear to have contributed significantly to the disastrous election result for Theresa May’s ruling Conservatives. The country has suffered an unprecedented terror wave this year, the London Bridge incident being the third after the earlier Westminster and Manchester attacks.
During the election campaign, May called for tougher measures to fight terrorism, claiming there was no direct link among the three incidents, but that “terrorism breeds terrorism.” There had been relative peace since the attack in July 2005 when suicide bombers killed 52 people in coordinated attacks on London’s transport system. But the threat level this year had been raised after similar attacks in Europe.
Confounding May’s surprise strategy to call an early election while she led opinion polls, the recent attacks only served to expose her negligence. May temporarily suspended her campaign, a move that was criticized by her opponents, and Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn cited various factors that contributed to the worsening security crises.
Security concerns helped rally people further in support of Labour due to the government’s apparent inability to prevent the attacks. Corbyn said May was trying to protect the public “on the cheap.” Police and security services “must get the resources they need” to safeguard the country, he said.

Cuts to policing hamper anti-terror efforts

Corbyn had earlier backed calls for May to resign as prime minister for her decision while she was home secretary to reduce spending on domestic policing. The reduction in police officers by 20,000 is thought to be the main reason security forces could not tackle rising extremism and that counter-insurgency efforts lacked effectiveness this year.
May raised the threat level in 2015, citing the conflicts in Syria and Iraq; Northern Ireland-related terrorism remained a lesser threat. After attacks in France and German, Kevin Hurley, former head of counter-terrorism for the City of London police, observed, “No-one can predict where it can happen next. There is no way of knowing where these attacks will occur.” The UK was considered at risk and there was no plausible reason for decreasing police forces.
Countering criticism from Corbyn after the Manchester attack, Security Minister Ben Wallace claimed the Labour leader was helping “justify” terrorism during a speech linking attacks with the UK’s foreign policy. Corbyn said it is the responsibility of governments to minimize the risk of further atrocities and to recognize the West’s “war on terror” is not working, Wallace said it was “incredibly disappointing and crass” to raise the subject just days after the Manchester attack. But the ongoing security threat saw the Conservatives lose the 20% lead it had before the election was called.
Labour gained significant strength, drawing 40.2% of the vote, while the Conservatives held on to 48.6%. May’s controversial policies, the economic slump, Brexit-caused inflation, forced austerity and a plan to cut welfare entitlements resulted in a hung Parliament.

Corbyn the reluctant replacement vows change

After Ed Miliband resigned as Labour head in May 2015, Corbyn said he only accepted the leadership so he could “promote some causes.” It was Corbyn who vowed to “change what we do abroad”, referring to Britain’s overseas military involvements as well as its air strikes against Isis.
Riding a popularity wave, Corbyn proposed a radical party manifesto aimed at returning the railways, the energy industry, water and even the Royal Mail, to public ownership. He also proposed a national education service similar to the National Health Service, and promised to build 100,000 council houses yearly and to establish a national investment bank to finance public spending. His promise to abolish university tuition fees was popular among the youth, who uncharacteristically turned out in strong numbers on election day.
The election result is evidence of a leftward swing in Britain while recent results in other Western countries showed a more populist move to the right. The current terror situation has encouraged racism and support for anti-immigration policies. Corbyn will have an uphill fight against prevalent racist trends. Support for refugee migration will also be difficult as the spike in terrorism is increasingly seen as a spill-over from the troubles in the Middle East. Effective intelligence and an efficient police network can help prevent attacks. A change in tactics with a fresh approach may be exactly what is required for a stable and peaceful Britain.


Asia Times is not responsible for the opinions, facts or any media content presented by contributors. In case of abuse, click here to report.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Incursions on the China-India border

An unsettled atmosphere prevails on the China-India border following accusations of trespass by Indian border guards in the Sikkim section, followed by an Indian attempt to obstruct ongoing construction activities by the Chinese frontier forces in the Donglang region. Demanding an Indian troop withdrawal as a precondition to any further meaningful dialogue, the Chinese Foreign Ministry urged India to carry out a thorough investigation into the matter. Reaffirming that the Sikkim section of the China-India border is well-defined by treaties, the ministry’s spokesperson, Geng Shuang, pointed out that the Indian government has repeatedly confirmed these settlements in writing and has expressed no objections to them previously. Urging India to respect boundary treaties and China’s territorial sovereignty to maintain peace and stability, the foreign ministry also informed India through diplomatic channels that the entry of official Indian pilgrims at the Nathu La Pass, linking Sikki...

Bollywood movie #Padmavati causes culture war

Usually, movies are for entertainment, providing escape from a monotonous routine, and causing a clash of cultures is rare. Yet in India today, the Bollywood movie Padmavati has created a rift and split the masses into two camps. Amid unprecedented debate and extreme threats, India has seen real-time rioting for most of this year. Named after a mythical Rajput queen whose existence cannot be proven historically, references only being found in poetry around the year 1540, the controversy has served to expose the vulnerability of society to movies and the poignant effect they have on the masses. At times such as these, movies can become larger than life and create new imaginary battlegrounds. It all began when the hard-line faction, Rajput Karni Sena, accused famous movie maker Sanjay Leela Bhansali of having insulted the legendary Hindu Rajput queen's memory by depicting her as a heroine with an historic Muslim king. Soon, its members were vandalizing cinemas and at...

Preparing for the next SAARC Summit

Preparing for the next SAARC Summit By Sabena Siddiqui 0   Comment(s) Print   E-mail China.org.cn, March 23, 2018 Adjust font size:  After a two-year interval, it is now vital that the revival and re-grouping of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) happens as soon as possible for regional re-integration.  Having been relegated to the backseat since India's refusal to participate in the SAARC Summit in 2016 which was to be held in Islamabad, Pakistan, it has been given much less attention than it deserves. Now it is the right time to re-assess the options for SAARC and expedite the pending process. Pakistan still has to host the next summit and to announce a new date for later this year. Formed in 1985, the SAARC Charter requires the respective heads of state or government of all the member countries to meet once a year. This usually transpires every 18 months unless one of the eight members refuses to attend the meet.  In ...